Above is a clip from the movie (Angel-A). It’s a scene showing the two main characters of the movie – a young couple; the woman is telling the man that he should care about himself, love himself and see value within his person. This clip is a very romantic scene, because it is quite rare that one would see a woman comforting a man in such a way and there’s a very real reason why it’s so rare. However, watching this particular scene may wrought in some of you viewers to think, “ahhh, yes. This is what feminism destroyed. This was THE man and woman – the shining, blissful artifact of the past.” Yes, theirs is a powerful little dialogue, but it is a cautionary tale at best. For if you think that 99.9% of the entire female population (anywhere on earth) particular in the west are like this woman in the video clip, you are terribly and sorely mistaken.
The propensity for men to think that there exists his personal, private, angelic, warm, serenic and comforting soulmate, IS the cause of much male suffering. Too often, men laugh at and ridicule the “Knight in Shining armor” fantasies that women often dream of – this desire for a man to come sweep them of their feet and ride them off into the sunset; the desire to be rescued forever and ever. We laugh at these fantasies, because we know that this fictional, ethereal male archetype that women have not only dreamt up, but are infatuated with, is very much unlike the actual male human being and his wants and desires. We laugh, because their view of the ideal male is so dramatically opposite to the reality in terms of how the male mind actually operates, that we see it no more than wishful thinking from an irrational female mind – an infantile need for a second daddy. Yet, the video clip that you just saw is the male version of this fantasy. We see an affectionate accepting Madonna, filling the male void with kind words and most importantly, a genuine connection satiating that deep-seated mother-need that rests within all men. That’s what it’s called – The Male Mother-Need.
It is the male condition; being one that displays variance down to our very chromosomal makeup in the form of the XY that has imprisoned us men in a constant make or break existence. Societies and civilizations have benefited well from an almost boundless male deductive capacity – the ability to see the unseen is a hallmark of the male and civilization as we know it, demands it in a cold, mechanical calculated sort of way; constantly testing the limits of the totality of its men and exerting incredible pressures on those men until the next male provides that next critical insight that ushers forth a wellspring of change.
This pressure, while benefiting the social group as a whole exerts an incredible amount of stress on men as a TOTALITY; and we are viewed as a totality – the individual male, his hopes, thoughts and dreams are irrelevant in the eyes of a society that views him just as another potential insight-rich-vein in the giant “watershed moment” mining operation.
The individual male who does not understand that society’s required indifference to “individual male desire”, may very well seek solace in the fantasy of “there exists, somewhere, a kind caring, exceptionally warm woman that would demand of me, only what I demand of her – simple affection and companionship.”
Sorrowfully, therein lies the danger.
This fantasy is what motivates men like Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant, Tiger Woods, Johnny Depp etc., to pair up with one woman in marriage and take great financial risks in doing so. For all of our incredible powers of male logic and reason, we strangely cannot logically conclude, yet, that women did not like us for us. Such an epiphany would thrust the individual male into a darkness, which has for eons, terrified him – he is alone and unless he does something useful, no one will see any intrinsic value in him. This raking and clawing threat is compounded many times over in many men of wealth and status such as Michael Jordan, because his wealth and fame compounds the need for a genuine connection with a single, (in his mind) incorruptible female.
Incredibly wealthy and emotionally needy men are the Holy Grail of the predatory western parasite, and that’s what we are so scared of. We are scared of the possibility, that we are only wanted in a society, because of the things we do to sustain it. We have a creeping suspicion, and we’d be right, that in the event that a society can somehow build, sustain and function without the contributions of men, that it’s only a matter of time before such a society will seek to expel its men.
I now then introduce to you the term, Male Civilizational Incumbency and define it as: a forced characteristic of ALL civilizations, exerted onto the totality of its male populace as an industrial resource, for the betterment of the men, women and children of that civilization, but, only at the expense of the male populace of that civilization, which is designed to maximize male innovation.
Rather than honestly looking at what appears to be a reality, in which the totality of females view the totality of men, as an unfeeling and untiring renewable resource to be drawn upon, we instead place our faith in the female, or rather, an individual female, who would never think to use us. This is why we as men tend to magnify even the most trivial acts of kindness from women as positive proof, or disproof positive, of the overall trend of female usary of men.
Is my assessment wrong? Is my prognosis too grim? Is it too much of an exaggeration? Well you do know that the majority of the homeless are men and they are for all the reasons I just provided.
To illustrate, if single mothers were the majority of the homeless, you’d see a society up in arms about it. There would be nonstop campaigns and trillions of dollars invested to solve the crisis. We all know that there are women having illegitimate children (outside of an established family unit) they cannot afford, yet they still have these illegitimate children, because they know that welfare — WIC and food stamps — will pay their way. It’s no secret. The question is: why are these programs put into place? The answer is simple: we care when women are out in the streets. We don’t care when men are out on the streets; it’s somehow the fault of men when they are, across the board, regardless of individual circumstances, because of Male Civilizational Incumbency.
Now, make no mistake; this is no plea for sympathy. It is, however, a wake-up call. You can choose to look for your own private little paradise on earth in the form of a woman, who most likely does not exist, or you can start to exert pressure onto society, by refusing to feed it.
Stop being scared that you may never find “the right woman” and start being scared, then angry that society is using you on multiple fronts without your consent.
Never before in history have men had the opportunity to truly understand themselves. Our identity has always been strained through a female filter first, then offered up to us, condensed in a solution of chivalry and misandry.
This is what I’m offering all of the men reading: this is a chance to contribute to a shift in male thought and attitude, whether women and society won or not. Taking such a path does not involve swearing off women. It merely involves accepting something about their nature that will, for the rest of your life, render you incapable of viewing them in the form that society has drawn up for you. This is what Male Sovereignty is.
As for the hatred of women; don’t flatter yourselves. We’ve been indifferent to them and about them for a long time.
Now, the questions and the answers to those questions about women are being framed in such a way that it can be devoid of any female input. That question must now be formed, shaped and eventually answered by men!
What path will we take going into the future? This, men, is your next watershed moment, except, this one has the potential to free men for good.
Many men will say that the objectives delineated here aren’t possible; that men are biologically incapable of rendering themselves free of the influences that women and society have over them. I say that it’s not only possible, but necessary.