Nearly 18 months ago now, I stated that the so-called coronavirus was simply a rebranding of the flu and other respiratory viruses. This has continued to play out, and has been proven to be true.
The PCR test has been confirmed to be a scam. The creator of the test, Kary Mullis, said explicitly that the test could not be used to test for infectious diseases.
Even if you go read about the PCR test for infectious disease and decide it makes sense, it is Lord Fauci himself who said that any cycle count over 35 would create a false positive.
“If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period,” Fauci told “This Week in Virology” on a July 16, 2020 podcast. Although Fauci has repeatedly gone back and changed things he’d said, but he hasn’t changed his statement on this issue.
On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a piece entitled “Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.,” where they admitted that in the states they looked at, 90% of tests were effectively false positives due to the cycle count.
(Start at about 4:00.)
This issue then quickly disappeared from the public discussion. The way it works now is that the health authorities – i.e., the government of any country – changes the number of cycles they do based on how many positives they want, and of course, the rule remains that anyone who tests positive for the virus is put down as having died from the virus. So, both the case count and death count can be easily modified arbitrarily.
After the vaccines began spreading, the CDC announced that they would be using different cycle counts for vaxxed and unvaxxed people. (He’s a “fact checker” admitting that and saying it doesn’t matter “because of science,” without mentioning that Fauci himself made the above statements. They interview a guy who says 40 or 45 is fine.)
They said that only the “low” cycle count of less than 29 cycles would be accepted for those who have been vaxxed. The previous standard was, as show above, 35 or over and they specifically said these new guidelines will only apply to the vaccinated.
Of course, the alleged “variants” of this new virus that doesn’t actually exist are being “discovered” using ultra high cycle rates, and then “tested” using high cycle rates.
Basically, it is very easy for them to use these tests to create any single narrative they want to create. If they want to say the vaxx is working, they lower the rate, as they’ve already done. If they want to say a new variant of the virus is breaking through the vaxx, they up the rate. If people are dying from the vaxx, they up the rate and give them a positive PCR test.
I’m not claiming to be a scientist here. I’m not making any bold statements. I am simply able to understand that these people themselves say that anything 35 or higher is positive, and yet they continue to use that number of cycles in testing regularly, unless they want the case count to go down, in which case they issue a guidance saying “nothing over 28.” This is very straightforward.
You don’t need to be a scientist.